What is Interdiscursivity in linguistics?

What is Interdiscursivity in linguistics?

Interdiscursivity refers to the mixing of diverse genres, discourses, or styles associated. with institutional and social meanings in a single text. This linguistic phenomenon. permeates through language use, especially in contemporary institutional settings.

Whose discourse A comparison of the foucauldian and habermasian concepts of discourse in critical is research?

A comparison of the two from the point of the IS researcher argues that the most important feature that Foucault’s and Habermas’s discourse theories have in common is their critical intention.

What is the purpose of critical discourse analysis?

Critical discourse analysis (CDA) is a qualitative analytical approach for critically describing, interpreting, and explaining the ways in which discourses construct, maintain, and legitimize social inequalities.

What is a discursive formation?

The term discursive formation identifies and describes written and spoken statements with semantic relations that produce discourses. As a researcher, Foucault applied the discursive formation to analyses of large bodies of knowledge, e.g. political economy and natural history.

What is the difference between intertextuality and interdiscursivity?

Intertextuality can be defined as a text-level phenomenon describing how a text refers to other, prior texts, whereas interdiscursivity is understood as a more abstract kind of borrowing of features of discourses or genres in text or talk (Bhatia, 2010: 35).

What is interdiscursivity in CDA?

Keywords: interdiscursivity, stylistic approach, CDA (critical discourse analysis) approach, perspective. Introduction. Interdiscursivity refers to the mixing of diverse genres, discourses, or styles associated with institutional and social meanings in a single text.

What does Foucault mean by positivity?

positivity. In the chapter entitled ‘Rarity, Exteriority, Accumulation’ (see section eleven), Foucault begins to use the term ‘positivity’ to designate an approach to discourse that excludes anything lying beneath it or hidden within it.

What are non discursive practices?

In The Archaeology of Knowledge Foucault lists non-discursive practices as including ‘institutions, political events, economic practices and processes’ (p. 162). He also argues that discourse does not underlie all cultural forms. Forms such as art and music are not discursive.

What is difference between discourse analysis and critical discourse analysis?

The main difference that I can point to is that CDA deals with more issues, such as intertextuality, interdiscursivity, and socio-historical context of formation and interpretations of texts/discourses, while DA in general does not go into such aspects of a given text/discourse.

What do we mean by intertextuality?

Definition of intertextuality : the complex interrelationship between a text and other texts taken as basic to the creation or interpretation of the text.

How is Recontextualization useful in CDA?

CDA uses the concept of ‘recontextualization’ to designate the de-location of a practice from its original context and its re-location within another – including the movement of discourses across practices, e.g. from political practice to media practice.

What does Foucault mean by discursive practices?

Discursive practices, as developed by Foucault, refers to the practices (or operations) of discourses, meaning knowledge formations, not to linguistic practices or language use. The focus is on how knowledge is produced through plural and contingent practices across different sites.

What are the 4 levels of discourse?

The four levels of moral discourse is used in addressing biomedical dilemmas. These four levels are Level of Case or Casuistry, Rules and Rights (Codes of Ethics), Normative Ethics and Metaethics.

What is Van Dijk model?

Mental models. As Van Dijk maintains, mental models “define and control our everyday perception and interaction in general and the production and comprehension of discourse in particular” (Van Dijk 2014a, p. 49). We create mental models based on our past experiences stored in the Episodic or Autobiographical Memory.